|
Recent Changes |
|
| |
|
| |
Most recently added publications:
|
|
| |
Mitchell, N., Randell, R., Foster, R., Dowding, D. A. W. N., Lattimer, V., Thompson, C. A. R. L., et al. (2009). A national survey of computerized decision support systems available to nurses in England. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(7), 772–780.
Abstract: mitchell n., randell r., foster r., dowding d., lattimer v., thompson c., cullum n. & summers r.(2009) Journal of Nursing Management 17, 772-780A national survey of computerized decision support systems available to nurses in England Aim To examine the characteristics of computerized decision support systems (CDSS) currently available to nurses working in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Method A questionnaire survey sent to a stratified random sample of 50% of all NHS care providers (Trusts) in England, asking respondents to provide information on CDSS currently used by nurses. Results Responses were received from 108 of the 277 Trusts included in the sample. Electronic patient record systems were the most common type of CDSS reported by Trusts (n = 61) but they were least likely to have features that have been associated with improved clinical outcomes. Conclusions The availability of CDSS with features that have been associated with improved patient outcomes for nurses in the NHS in England is limited. There is some evidence that the nature of the Trust affects whether or not nurses have access to CDSS to assist their decision making. Implications for nursing management The implementation of CDSS is increasing throughout the NHS. Many CDSS are introduced without adequate evidence to support its introduction and there is little evaluation of the benefits once they are implemented. Policy makers and nursing management should consider whether the introduction of CDSS aids nurse decision making and benefits patient outcomes.
|
|
Gosling AS, W. J. I., Spencer R. (2004). Nurses' use of online clinical evidence. J Adv Nurs, 47(2), 201–11.
Abstract: Background. The 'information explosion' presents a significant challenge to the nursing profession. One way to assist access to information is to provide electronic information resources at the point of care. A large-scale survey of nurses working in the public health system in New South Wales, Australia, was undertaken as part of a 2-year evaluation of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP). This is a website which provides 24 hour, online access to a range of evidence sources at the point of care.
Aim. This paper reports a study to investigate factors influencing nurses' use of online evidence available at the point of care and to examine differences between nurses in different roles.
Method. Nurses from 65 randomly selected hospitals were surveyed. A convenience sample representing 25% of nursing staff at these hospitals was sought. Eighty-four per cent of the survey quota was met and 3128 questionnaires were completed and returned.
Results. The results showed that 58% of nurses had heard of the CIAP and, of those, 70% had used the website's resources. Senior nurses had greater awareness and use than others. The most frequent reasons for use were to fill a knowledge gap and for personal education. Lack of training was the most frequently cited reason for not using the website. Use of online evidence, particularly amongst senior staff, was higher than reported in previous studies.
Conclusion. Use of online evidence was associated with nursing role, and with managerial and organizational support. Diffusion of innovation theory can help to explain some of the patterns observed. The use and impact of online evidence should be interpreted in the context of nursing practice and culture.
Keywords: evidence-based practice information technology in health, information-seeking, nursing roles, organisational culture
|
|
Gosling, A. S., Westbrook, J. I., & Coiera, E. W. (2003). Variation in the use of online clinical evidence: a qualitative analysis. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 69(1), 1–16.
Abstract: Objective: To investigate factors influencing variations in clinicians' use of an online evidence retrieval system. Setting: Public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Method: Web log analysis demonstrated considerable variation in rates of evidence use by clinicians at different hospitals. Focus groups and interviews were held with 61 staff from three hospitals, two with high rates of use and one with a low rate of use, to explore variation in evidence use. Results: Differences between hospitals' and professional groups' (doctors, nurses and allied health) use of online evidence could be explained by organizational, professional and cultural factors. These included the presence of champions, organizational cultures which supported evidence-based practice (EBP), and database searching skills of individual clinicians. Staff shortages, ease of access and time taken to use the online evidence system were cited as barriers to use at the low use site, but no objective differences in these measures were found between the high and low use sites. Conclusion: Social and cultural factors were found to be better discriminators of high and low evidence use than technical factors.
Keywords: Evaluation; Online resources; Qualitative analysis; Health informatics
|
|
Ball, M. J., Weaver, C., & Abbott, P. A. (2003). Enabling technologies promise to revitalize the role of nursing in an era of patient safety. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 69(1), 29–38.
Abstract: The application of information technology (IT) in health care has the potential to transform the delivery of care, as well as the health care work environment, by streamlining processes, making procedures more accurate and efficient, and reducing the risk of human error. For nurses, a major aspect of this transformation is the refocusing of their work on direct patient care and away from being a conduit of information and communication among departments. Several of the technologies discussed, such as physician order entry and bar code technology, have existed for years as standalone systems. Many others are just being developed and are being integrated into complex clinical information systems (CISs) with clinical decision support at their core. While early evaluation of these systems shows positive outcome measurements, financial, technical, and organizational hurdles to widespread implementation still remain. One major issue is defining the role nurses, themselves, will play in the selection and implementation of these systems as they become more steeped in the knowledge of nursing informatics. Other challenges revolve around issues of job satisfaction and the attraction and retention of nursing staff in the midst of a serious nursing shortage. Despite these concerns, it is expected that, in the long run, the creation of an electronic work environment with systems that integrate all functions of the health care team will positively impact cost-effectiveness, productivity, and patient safety while helping to revitalize nursing practice.
Keywords: Information technology; Nursing informatics; Clinical information systems; Clinical decision support; Computerized patient record; Patient safety; Medical errors
|
|
McCormick, K. A., Delaney, C. J., Brennan, P. F., Effken, J. A., Kendrick, K., Murphy, J., et al. (2006). Guideposts to the Future--An Agenda for Nursing Informatics. JAMIA, 14(1), 19–24.
Abstract: As new directions and priorities emerge in health care, nursing informatics leaders must prepare to guide the profession appropriately. To use an analogy, where a road bends or changes directions, guideposts indicate how drivers can stay on course. The AMIA Nursing Informatics Working Group (NIWG) produced this white paper as the product of a meeting convened: 1) to describe anticipated nationwide changes in demographics, health care quality, and health care informatics; 2) to assess the potential impact of genomic medicine and of new threats to society; 3) to align AMIA NIWG resources with emerging priorities; and 4) to identify guideposts in the form of an agenda to keep the NIWG on course in light of new opportunities. The anticipated societal changes provide opportunities for nursing informatics. Resources described below within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Committee for Health and Vital Statistics (NCVHS) can help to align AMIA NIWG with emerging priorities. The guideposts consist of priority areas for action in informatics, nursing education, and research. Nursing informatics professionals will collaborate as full participants in local, national, and international efforts related to the guideposts in order to make significant contributions that empower patients and providers for safer health care.
|
|
|
About |
| |
This literature database is maintained by the ICTconsequences.net (Francisco Lupi?ez-Villanueva). You're welcome to send any questions or suggestions to our feedback address. The database is powered by refbase, an open source database front-end for managing scientific literature & citations. |
 |
|